On the morning of 28 August 1628, a disgruntled young military lieutenant, angry at being passed over twice for promotion and owed £80 in back pay for his part in the disasterous campaigns against the French the previous year, in which he had been seriously wounded, took a cheap knife and transformed the political scene in England at a thrust.
The man was John Felton, the son of a moderately well-off family from Suffolk and his victim was the Duke of Buckingham, the former George Villiers, favourite of the first two Stuart kings, but generally hated by the public at large, after a serious of failed military actions against the French.
The assassination took place at what was then known as the Greyhound Inn, in Portsmouth's High Street, and although various paintings and engravings show the attack taking place outside the building, contemporary accounts are pretty unanimous that it was actually inside the inn, which was at the time owned by Captain John Mason, Buckingham's Paymaster for the fleet at Portsmouth.
In the confusion that immediately followed the stabbing, Felton managed to make his way through the building and into the kitchen area and could almost certainly have escaped undetected, but thinking that his action would meet with public support, he returned to the scene of the murder and gave himself up.
But if Felton thought he would be treated like some sort of national hero, he was greatly mistaken; Buckingham the dandy, socialite and incompetent military leader may have been hugely unpopular with the populace in general, but he was effectively Charles I's prime minister (the office did not exist as such for another century) and the authorities took the view that it wouldn't do to have people wandering around bumping off senior government figures.
On hearing the news, King Charles, who had himself visited the Greyhound only three days earlier, retreated to his private chambers, grief stricken over the loss of his and his late father's closest friend, whilst the population did indeed receive that very same news with spontaneous outbursts of joy.
Felton, meanwhile, was taken under guard to the Tower of London, where he was repeatedly questioned, but his case would be responsible for prompting a change in English law, for when Charles asked Parliament's opinion as to whether the assassin should be questioned under torture, the response was largely negative.
Initially, the authorities were convinced that Felton had acted as part of a larger conspiracy, but he steadfastly maintained that he had acted alone and, in his opinion, for the public good - he said that he had come across a copy of Felton had come across a copy of the 1628 Parliament’s Remonstrance against the Duke of Buckingham and believed that the man was acting against the good of the country. .
By late November, the interrogators accepted that Felton was telling the truth and he was put on trial. Worried about possible public unrest, the authorities made sure that Felton was portrayed as a wicked, cowardly, atheistic criminal, who had acted out of purely personal motives and that his promotion requests had been denied because he was a poor soldier and an incompetent officer - and we think we suffer at the hands of spin doctors today!
There seems little doubt that Felton was somewhat unbalanced mentally in the period leading up to the assassination, as he was known to have become morose and moody and somewhat withdrawn and surly, but the authorities and the lawyers prosecuting him really laid it on with a trowel, so when he was found guilty, there could be only one verdict.
Two days later, on the scaffold at Tyburn, Felton confessed his crime before a crowd of onlookers and openly repented his actions, reiterating the fact that he had acted alone and that the only one to drive him to commit the crime had been Satan himself.
After he was hanged, his body was taken down and returned to Portsmouth, where it was hung in chains and left to rot, but rather than acting as a public deterrent, his corpse became an object of veneration to many. |
|
 |
 |
George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham
(28 August 1592 – 23 August 1628) |
 |
| |
 |
 |
Charles I - a very stubborn man, he protected Buckingham against attempts made by Parliament to censure him for his incompetence in several actions against the French, which left the way open for Felton's assassination of the chief minister.
Ironically, only just over 20 years later, Charles himself would meet his end on the scaffold, but at least his beheading would have been quick, compared with the barbaric hanging methods used at the time of Felton's execution (see below).. |
|